Data Mining Social Networks, Smart Phone Data, and Other Data Base, Yet Maintaining Privacy

Is it possible to data mine social networks in such anearest cell phone, to another near cell phone, to the
way to does not hurt the privacy of the individual user,person which is intended to receive it. And the data
and if so, can we justify doing such? It wasn't too longpassing through each mobile device, will not be able to
ago the CEO of Google stated that it was importantread any of the information which was it is not
that they were able to keep data of Google searchesassigned to receive as it wasn't sent to it. By using
so they can find disease, flu, and food born medicalsuch a scheme telecommunication companies can
clusters. By using this data and studying the regions inexpand their services without building more new cell
the searches to help fight against outbreaks oftowers, and therefore they can lower the price.
diseases, or food borne illnesses in the distributionHowever, it also means that when you lay your cell
system. This is one good reason to store the data, andphone on the table, and it is turned on it would be
collect it for research, as long as it is anonomized, thenconstantly passing data through it, data which is not
theoretically no one is hurt.yours, and you are not getting paid for that, even
Unfortunately, this also scares the users, because theythough you had to purchase the smart phone. But if
know if the searches are indeed stored, this data canthe phone was given to you, with a large battery, so it
be used against them in the future, for instance, higherwouldn't go dead during all those transmissions, you
insurance rates, bombardment of advertising, or getprobably wouldn't care, as long as your data packets
them put onto some sort of future governmentof information were indeed safe and no one else could
"thought police" watch-list. Especially considering all theread them.
political correctness, and new ways of defining hateThis technology exists now, and is being discussed,
speech, bullying, and what is, what isn't, and what mightand consider if you will that the whole strategy of
be a domestically home-grown terrorist. The futurenetworking smart cell phones or personal tech devices
concept of the thought police is very scary to mosttogether is nothing new. For instance, the same
folks.strategies have been designed for satellites, and to
Usually if you want to collect data from a user, youuse an analogy, this scheme is very similar to the
have to give them something back in return, andstrategies FedEx uses when it sends packages to the
therefore they are willing to sign away certain privacynext nearest FedEx office if that is their destination,
rights on that data in trade for the use of suchwithout sending all of the packages all the way across
services; such as on their cell phone, perhaps a freethe country to the central Memphis sort, and then all
iPhone app or a virtual product in an online socialthe way back again. They are saving time, fuel, space,
network.and energy, and if cell phones did this it would save the
Artificially Intelligent Search Featurestelecommunication companies mega bucks in the
It is no surprised that AI search features are gettingsavings of building new cell towers.
smarter, even able to anticipate your next searchAs long as you got a free cell phone, which many of
question, or what you are really trying to ask, evenus do, unless we have the mega top of the line edition,
second guessing your question for instance. Now then,and if they gave you a long-lasting free battery it is
let's discuss this for a moment. Many folks very muchwin-win for the user. You probably wouldn't care, and
enjoy the features of search features, which usethe telecommunication companies could most likely
artificial intelligence to recommend potential otherlower the cost of services, and not need to upgrade
books, which they might be interested in. Andtheir system, because they can carry a lot more data,
therefore the user probably does not mind giving awaywithout hundreds of billions of dollars in future
information about itself, for this upgraded service orinvestments.
ability, nor would the person mind having cookies putAlso a net centric system like this is safer to disruption
onto their Web browser.in the event of an emergency, when emergency
Nevertheless, these types of systems are alwayscommunications systems take precedence, putting
exploited for other purposes. For instance consider theevery cell phone user as secondary traffic at the cell
Federal Trade Commission's do not call list, andtowers, which means their calls may not even get
consider how many corporations, political partythrough.
organizations, and all of their affiliates and partnersNext, the last thing the telecommunication company
were able to bypass these rules due to the fact thatwould want to do is to data mine that data, or those
the consumer or customer had bought something frompackets of information from people like a soccer mom
them in the last six months. This is not whatcalling her son waiting at the bus stop at school. And
consumers or customers had in mind when theyanyone with a cell phone certainly wouldn't want their
decided they wanted to have this "do not call list" andpackets of information being stolen from them and
the resultant and response from the market place, well,rerouted because someone near them hacked into the
it proves we cannot trust the telecommunicationsystem and had a cell phone that was displaying all of
companies, their lobbyists, or the insiders within theirtheir information.
group (many of which over the years have indeedYou can see the problems with all this, but you can
been somehow connected to the intelligence agenciesalso see the incredible economies of scale by making
- AT&T - NSA Echelon for example.)each and every cell phone a transmitter and receiver,
Now then, this article is in no way to be considered awhich it already is in principle anyway, at least now for
conspiracy theory, it is just a known fact, yes nationalall data you send and receive. In the new system, if all
security does need access to such information, andthe data which is closest by is able to transfer through
often it might be relevant, catching bad guys, terrorists,it, and send that data on its way. The receiving cell
spies, etc. The NSA is to protect the American People.phone would wait for all the packets of data were in,
However, when it comes to the telecommunicationand then display the information.
companies, their job is to protect shareholder's equity,You can see why such a system also might cause
maximize quarterly profits, expand their businesspeople to have a problem with it because of what
models, and create new profit centers in theirthey call net neutrality. If someone was downloading a
corporations.movie onto their iPad using a 3G or 4G wireless
Thus, such user data will be and has been exploitednetwork, it could tie up all the cell phones nearby that
for future profits against the wishes of the consumer,were moving the data through them. In this case, it
without the consumer benefiting from free services formight upset consumers, but if that traffic could be
lower prices in any way. If there is an explainedsomewhat delayed by priority based on an AI
reason, trade-off, and a monetary consideration, thealgorithm decision matrix, something simple, then such a
consumer might feel obliged to have additional callstactic for packet distribution plan might allow for this to
bothering them while they are at home, additionaloccur without disruption from the actual cell tower,
advertising, and tracking of their preferences for easemeaning everyone would be better off. Therefore we
of use and suggestions. What types of suggestions?all get information flow faster, more dispersed, and
Well, there is a Starbucks two-blocks from here, turntherefore safer from intruders. Please consider all this.
right, then turn left and it is 200 yards, with parkingReferences;
available; "Sale on Frappachinos for gold-card holders
today!" In this case the telecommunication company1. "Privacy on the Line - The Politics of Wiretapping and
tracks your location, knows your preferences, andEncryption," by Whitfield Diffie and Susan Landau, MIT
collects a small fee from Starbucks, and you get aPress, Cambridge, MA, (1999), pp. 364, ISBN:
free-phone, and 20% off your monthly 4G wireless0-262-04167-7.
fee. Is that something a consumer might want; when2. Wall Street Journal Article; "On the Web's Cutting
asked 75% of consumers or smart phone users say;Edge, Anonymity in Name Only," by Emily Steel and
yes. See that point?Julia Angwin.
In the future smart phones may have data transferred3. WSJ article; "The Great Privacy Debate," by Jim
between them, rather than going through a given orHarper of Cato Institute, and Nicholas Carr author,
closest cell tower. In other words, packets ofSaturday-Sunday Edition, August 7-8, 2010.
information may go from your cell phone, to the next