| naBody"> | | | | exchange traffic on a barter basis, rather than on a |
| A study conducted by âThe | | | | cash basisânet neutrality being the key. Such |
| Economistâ magazine, showed a strong | | | | arrangements bypass ITU protocol, regarding revenue |
| correlation between the price of a âBig | | | | sharing and allow net lower cost to all the ISP |
| Macâ in a country and itâs cost of | | | | participants. |
| living. The cost of livingârent, consumer goods, | | | | The exchange point essentially allows the |
| food, entertainment is usually significantly higher in the | | | | ISPâs to segment the traffic, according to the |
| US than in the developing world (and so is the price of | | | | destination and by pass the tier-1 providers. Results are |
| a âBig Macâ). However, âBig | | | | dramatically lower cost and lower latency. |
| Macâ indexes notwithstanding, the price of | | | | The entrenched incumbents in developing countries |
| Internet bandwidth in the third world is off the charts. | | | | (such as Pakistan) have the most to lose from |
| As a point of comparison, a 1 Mbit/sec ADSL costs | | | | domestic exchange of traffic and are the biggest |
| about 20 dollar for a home user in the US, and about | | | | impediments to the adoption. The governments of |
| 800 dollars in Pakistan. Needless to say, there is a | | | | such countries also have a vested interest in |
| strong need for a reduction in cost and improvement | | | | supporting the monopoly of Telecom companies, given |
| of quality of service. | | | | the revenues and taxes received. The larger |
| The issue with the developing countries is the lack of | | | | ISPâs also have a vested interest in using high |
| infrastructure. Our case study of Pakistan showed that | | | | cost of connectivity to hasten the exit of smaller or |
| all of Pakistan has only one backbone fiber line, | | | | less capitalized players through attrition. |
| resulting in bottlenecks. The lack of redundancy has its | | | | In conclusion, to reap advantage of Internet exchange |
| costsâin July 2005 the fiber wire got severed | | | | points, the telecom companies have to overcome their |
| resulting in massive outages. The back up satellite | | | | monopolistic ways and there has to be an effort to |
| connection was hardly a solace to the burgeoning IT | | | | make a neutral body responsible for the traffic sharing |
| industry of Pakistan. | | | | facilities. The lower cost of internet will actually foster |
| A significant percentage of traffic in Pakistan is | | | | overall growth in overall traffic, which will compensate |
| domestic, but itâs routed through servers in the | | | | the monopoliesâ initial loss of international |
| US and Europe. A trace route from one Pakistan ISP | | | | traffic. |
| to another yields a shocking patternâpackets | | | | Did you find this article useful? For more useful tips and |
| traveling from Pakistan to UK, US, Singapore and back | | | | hints, points to ponder and keep in mind, techniques, |
| to Pakistan. The situation is exacerbated in the case of | | | | and insights pertaining to Internet Business, do please |
| fiber failures, when the traffic gets routed over multiple | | | | browse for more information at our websites. |
| satellite hops. The latency is about 700 milliseconds | | | | Report this article |
| hop(or about 1.5 seconds for every transaction). This | | | | This article is free for republishing |
| not only adds latency, needlessly raising costs but | | | | Source: |
| chokes the connection slowing down genuine Pakistan | | | | Republish this article |
| to international traffic. | | | | |
| Internet Exchange Point is a facility to allow the | | | | Ask a Question About this Article |
| exchange of traffic between multiple ISPâs. In | | | | >> Is it safe to buy on Ebay? |
| general the ISPâs have to pay to the tier-1 | | | | >> How do I follow a Link? (The sender wants |
| providers or the governing body(say Pakistan Telecom | | | | validation of my Email address). In order to register at |
| Authority) for the carriage of traffic. Even if the traffic | | | | a Website. |
| is local, without the Exchange Point, the traffic is routed | | | | >> Babysitter is the Television. |
| over the international Internet. | | | | >> AIM not working, any ideas why? |
| The peering arrangement allows local ISPs to | | | | |