The History And Background Of Video Conferencing

Videoconferencing in its first forms has been around amost businesses were willing to pay. The big leap
lot longer than you might imagine. In 1964, a new deviceforward was that this system was PC based, and
called the Picturephone was demonstrated at thevideo conferencing was finally on track to be widely
World's Fair in New York. Even then it wasn'tavailable. It was still pricey, at $20,000 for the system
completely new - the idea of joining video and voiceand $30 an hour. The other drawback was that you
was first trailed in 1956 by AT&T. This was aalso still needed to use a conference room specially
huge leap forward - instead of just hearing a person'sequipped for videoconferencing. This meant the
voice, you could see them as well. And soparticipants had to relocate to the videoconferencing
videoconferencing began. It would be a lot more yearsroom, and also had to pay to use the facilities.
before it reached the incredible heights it has today -1992 was the year when videoconferencing got
now large groups of people can communicate acrosscaught up in the technology boom and an affordable
the world, whether in boardrooms or hospitals, and theoption for the masses started to become reality.
flow of data, ideas and visual presentations canAT&T introduced their new Videophone, which
happen instantaneously.only cost $1,500. Still expensive for the general public,
It was 1970 before a commercial version of thebut business was definitely starting to get interested.
Picturephone service was put into service inNext came Macintosh, with their CU-SeeMe system
downtown Pittsburgh. AT&T executives werefor the personal computer. Initially it didn't have audio,
confident that in just ten years, there would be morebut the video component was excellent. In 1993 they
than a million Picturephones in use. However theyadded multipoint capability, and by 1994 it was a true
reckoned without the cost. At more than $160 avideoconferencing with audio and video.
month, the Picturephone might still be affordable toUnfortunately it was only accessible to Mac users, but
some businesses, but it was out of reach of thedevelopers worked hard until they came up with a
average person. Add to that the fact that theWindows compatible version. Early versions didn't have
equipment was bulky, difficult to use, and the pictureaudio, but by August 1995 Cu-SeeMe was available
was so tiny that it could hardly be seen, and it's notfor Windows with full audio and video functionality. This
surprising that the Picturephone wasn't a roaringwas hugely important, because now someone could
success.talk to another person anywhere in the world, and yet
But the seed had been planted, and by the 1980s,still be sitting in their own office or home. Now that the
other companies were working on developing a videobenchmark had been set, more high-tech companies
conferencing product. 1982 saw the release of the firstjoined the race and videoconferencing software and
videoconferencing system from Compression Labs. Itequipment options expanded. Microsoft joined in 1996,
was also huge, and took up an enormous amount ofwith their NetMeeting product, and now
resources, which could trip 15 amp circuit breakers.videoconferencing was basically available to anyone
With a price tag of $250,000, it was definitely outsidewith a home computer.
the reach of most businesses, let alone the fact thatIn 1996, too, VocalTec Surf&Call was released,
using a connection cost $1,000 per hour. Still, it was thewhich was the first web to phone plug-in. And by
only working videoconferencing system on the market.2000, Samsung had developed the MPEG-4 streaming
It would be four more years before PictureTel, in3G video cell phone. By streaming the media, it can be
Delaware, launched an opposition product. It wasread, heard and viewed the instant it's being delivered.
substantially cheaper, at only $80,000 for the systemIt's now possible to videoconference anywhere in the
and $100 an hour for lines. The race had begun. In 1991world for as little as $12 a month and the cost of a
PictureTel joined with IBM to introduce a cheapergood phone. Industry giants like Yahoo and MSN have
version, with the pictures being sent in black and white.gone one step further and made the service free.
This certainly reduced costs, but still not to a level that