What is Behind the Telecommunications Revolution?

The telecommunications revolution the merging ofModification of Final Judgment (MFJ) has since been
voice, video and other data transmission and theadministered with remarkable energy and wisdom by
proliferation of new telecommunications products andJudge Greene, to whom this nation owes enormous
services has been one of America's leadinggratitude.
technological and economic success stories. AtBy unleashing competition in various segments of the
bottom, the key reason is that our scientists, engineerstelephone industry, the MFJ has delivered the benefits
and businesses have developed and introducedthat competition in other markets routinely guarantees:
telecommunications technologies at a faster pace thaninnovation, better products and services, greater
anywhere else in the world.efficiency, and lower prices. Consider that since the
Public policies that have promoted competition haveMFJ:
been critical to this result. Perhaps nowhere is thisInterstate long-distance prices for the average
more evident than in the case of telephone services,residential customer in real terms (adjusted for inflation)
where through the efforts over two decades of thehave fallen by more than 50 percent without
Justice Department and Judge Harold Greene, and thecompromising universal service;
work of the FCC, competition has become the centralThere has been a virtual explosion in the types of
organizing principle of the industry.telephones and services that consumers can choose
Until the Department sued and eventually broke upfrom;
AT&T, that company had a monopoly over thisCompetition has stimulated the development of
nation's telephone market. It was a regulated monopoly,hundreds of innovative voice and data services (such
to be sure. But it was also one that thwartedas call waiting and voice mail);
competition and innovation. New companies like MCISpurred by smaller carriers and MCI and Sprint, the
that wanted to provide long-distance service could notthree largest long-distance providers (including AT&T)
do so because AT&T's local operating companiesnow have laid fiber optic cable throughout much of the
refused to provide interconnections to their local loops.country and thus have already built significant portions
Similarly, other manufacturers of telephone equipmentof the backbone for the Nil; and
wanted to sell equally, if not more, innovative productsCompetition in the telephone equipment market has
but were frustrated by AT&T from doing so becauseopened whole new markets and spawned the
of the telephone company's incentives and ability,development and sale of new products.
through its monopoly control of the local loop, to buyIn short, the MFJ has enabled the United States to
such equipment only from its wholly owned subsidiary.maintain its technological leadership in
Western Electric.telecommunications. Nations that have stuck to the old
These practices were ended when the Department ofmonopoly model of telephone services have fallen
Justice, led by my antitrust law professor in law school,behind. That is why many are now trying to emulate
William Baxter, obtained a consent decree in 1982. Aus, rather than the other way around.